10 Signs You Picked the Wrong Web Design Agency - Marketing WTF?
I’ve just emerged from a very difficult web site redesign project with a local agency that hasn’t yet moved into the Web 2.0 world. After living through the ordeal, I thought I would share some of the lessons I learned during the process to help others avoid the same nightmare. (I’m also hoping the process is somewhat cathartic for me too.) Fortunately, most of these signs are easily identifiable during the review stages. If I’ve missed any, please share your ideas.
- When you ask about multi-browser testing, you’re told “Well I have a Mac and so and so has a PC, so I’m sure we have it covered.” Sadly, there is no one browser standard and today’s websites must look great in the top browsers-Firefox, IE, and Safari, at the very least. That requires a systematic plan for multi-browser testing and attention to detail.
- There is no upfront information discovery session to determine your goals and objectives for the site. No one asks about the personae of your target audience or your sales process. It is absolutely vital to start your website design with careful consideration of your target audience and how you engage with them. It’s also wise to map your conversion strategy prior to design.
- When you mention in the first meeting that the site design needs to support your SEO efforts, the instant response is “Oh we don’t do SEO.” Designing a website without considering your future SEO efforts is extremely dangerous. Hard coded H1 tags, too many graphics, failing to redirect valuable inbound links, and a difficult to update site will hamper your efforts.
- Your agency’s idea of a project plan is a list of dates for a design template, copy drafts and a go-live date. Marketers really need to approach a website design or redesign like a software development process with a solid project plan that takes into consideration the need to iterate and fully test.
- After several attempts to come up with a design, you have to supply “inspiration” sites to get them on track. Well, this one really should go without saying but sadly it still happens. If you find yourself stuck with an agency that can’t figure out how to design to your satisfaction despite being given brand guidelines, target personae, a site architecture, etc. you can pull the project out of the ditch by giving them some other sites that you like to help them get on track. If the right work has been done upfront to understand your business, however, you shouldn’t have to do this.
- You realize that when the home page design is reviewed on a normal size monitor, the flash movie takes up the entire monitor screen pushing your core content below the fold. Just like multi-browser testing, monitor size is critical. It is vital that you look at the site on different monitors to ensure visitors can get to the content they need.
- Once the home page is designed no further design goes into the layout and graphics elements of the subpages. This is like walking into a gorgeous store with a beautiful façade and stepping into a bare warehouse. Put the same care and attention that went into the home page into the subpages to make sure you provide content and next steps for your visitors.
- There are no status checks or project meetings. In fact, it is extremely difficult to get a return phone call from your project manager. Designing a website is a team effort requiring lots of different team members to contribute. And, that requires coordination and conversation. Make sure your agency schedules frequent project update meetings and discussions to make sure you are on track.
- You are ready to go live with the new site, your project manager is nowhere to be found leaving you to work with a developer. This is a biggie. Always make sure you have a plan for go-live, a backup plan in case something goes wrong. And, go live in the middle of the night or over the weekend, just in case there are problems no one will see them.
- You must conform to the agency’s process of logging in all processes, errors, changes and questions to an Extranet with no training on it. You find that you still must post those changes multiple times before resolution. OK, you got me on that one, it was just a rant.
Today’s B2B Marketers need to have a well thought out site architecture, succinct and compelling messages for their target audiences, engaging designs, and an error-free site that supports search engine optimization. And marketers should select their agencies carefully, building in strict contractual demands for things like multi-browser testing, and SEO-friendly structure, clean and well-designed page layout, and tight security lockdowns. Pick your web designer like you would pick a software development shop.
Wow, I feel so much better now.
5 Responses to “10 Signs You Picked the Wrong Web Design Agency - Marketing WTF?”
Leave a Reply















June 4th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Wonderfull idea.
June 5th, 2008 at 8:49 am
Interesting subject
June 5th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
No. 5 is interesting to me. We go through an introductory exercise of reviewing sites with the client, because we’ve found that some marketers have a hard time verbally expressing their design thoughts.
Of course, this example is not apples to apples with what you’re saying (as our exercise is pre-design). But I’d encourage the client to express themselves any way they can if they’ve see a function or feature they like.
I enjoyed the post!
June 12th, 2008 at 11:34 am
I hear ya, but why make the client go through so much agony to seek out examples? I mean, who is the expert in design in this instance? If you present logical and compelling reasons behind a design, hopefully, the client should follow your lead. Let me share an example - I’ve worked with DesignEdge, here in Austin, and they have a wonderful technique where they interview the client to identify their brand goals and objectives. They really get a feel for the customer’s goals and the audience. Then they plot out a quadrant showing the core attributes on each axis. They then overlay similar products/websites/designs in each segment of the quadrant based on how those designs matched up to the attributes. So, you can easily see how the design would support your goals and select a “direction” to follow. This is difficult to describe in a blog comment, but it was an excellent exercise to get everyone on the same page. And, best of all (for me anyway), I didn’t have to spend hours scouring the Internet to get the design moving in the right direction. I think this is a classic example of the disconnect between designers and the “client from hell.” As Marketers, we have very specific objectives that we must meet. Fortunately, Marketing has become much more metrics-based and objective. Design must follow this lead and become more targeted and based on objectives. Techniques such as the one I described are a huge leap forward in making this happen.
July 9th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Hi Pam!
Thanks for sharing that DesignEdge example. It’s smart!
Ours is similar, too. We don’t ask the client to search for sites and design, we provide the examples after discussing their goals and researching their vertical.
For example, if we’re building an eCommerce site with 1,000s of products, we’d likely show a Javascript reveal that provides product data and one-click ordering. We ask their opinions before offering it up as a solution, so we can gauge the marketers willingness to use new technology or a specific design element.
Sorry, I just now got around to re-visiting this topic. Have a good one.
- jd