<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter is Worth What!?! &#8211; Marketing WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-wtf/twitter-is-worth-what-marketing-wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-wtf/twitter-is-worth-what-marketing-wtf/</link>
	<description>B2B Marketing and Sales Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:49:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-wtf/twitter-is-worth-what-marketing-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-2802</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.reachforce.com/?p=1968#comment-2802</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you.  Twitter is great.  The spin-offs are interesting.  The amount of investment...what is it really paying for?  1.  Best kept secret.  2) Tulips 3) Madoff/Ponzi

I&#039;m hoping on #1.  If so, the brilliance factor on this might be a better case study than Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you.  Twitter is great.  The spin-offs are interesting.  The amount of investment&#8230;what is it really paying for?  1.  Best kept secret.  2) Tulips 3) Madoff/Ponzi</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping on #1.  If so, the brilliance factor on this might be a better case study than Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
