<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Sales Throws Marketing Under the Bus…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-and-sales-alignment/why-sales-throws-marketing-under-the-bus%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-and-sales-alignment/why-sales-throws-marketing-under-the-bus%e2%80%a6/</link>
	<description>B2B Marketing and Sales Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:49:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Needles</title>
		<link>http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-and-sales-alignment/why-sales-throws-marketing-under-the-bus%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Needles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.reachforce.com/?p=1868#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>Hi, Lauren, and thanks for the &#039;review&#039; of our white paper.

It still amazes me that sales and marketing (mis-)alignment is so reminescent of the cold war.  A much better approach to this is mutual understanding and workig on the problem.

Achieving sales/marketing alignment all boils down to a four-step process:

One, both parties need to recognize they have a common goal -- i.e., closing business -- and that must be focused around the buyer and his/her process.  The B2B buyer is changing, and the time is right to understand this and to make sure your sales and marketing practices are re-aligning.

I touched on this on my guest blog piece on this site on Monday:

http://blog.reachforce.com/sales-and-marketing-tips/what-is-silverpop-engage-b2b-%E2%80%93-marketing-automation-who%E2%80%99s-who/

Two, both parties need to recognize their roles are changing -- driven by a changing buyer.  This re-education is critical and could help not only marketing improve productivity, but also sales.

Three, both parties need a common language for talking about the process of generating, nurturing and closing leads -- lead scoring -- as you highlight above.

Four, both partnes need to work toward a repeatable lead management process built on these principles -- rather than just a recurring gripe session.

To get going, you need to &#039;break the ice&#039; in this cold war, and we hope humor is one way to do that -- hence the title and tenor of the paper.

Thanks, again, for the review and thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Lauren, and thanks for the &#8216;review&#8217; of our white paper.</p>
<p>It still amazes me that sales and marketing (mis-)alignment is so reminescent of the cold war.  A much better approach to this is mutual understanding and workig on the problem.</p>
<p>Achieving sales/marketing alignment all boils down to a four-step process:</p>
<p>One, both parties need to recognize they have a common goal &#8212; i.e., closing business &#8212; and that must be focused around the buyer and his/her process.  The B2B buyer is changing, and the time is right to understand this and to make sure your sales and marketing practices are re-aligning.</p>
<p>I touched on this on my guest blog piece on this site on Monday:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.reachforce.com/sales-and-marketing-tips/what-is-silverpop-engage-b2b-%E2%80%93-marketing-automation-who%E2%80%99s-who/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.reachforce.com/sales-and-marketing-tips/what-is-silverpop-engage-b2b-%E2%80%93-marketing-automation-who%E2%80%99s-who/</a></p>
<p>Two, both parties need to recognize their roles are changing &#8212; driven by a changing buyer.  This re-education is critical and could help not only marketing improve productivity, but also sales.</p>
<p>Three, both parties need a common language for talking about the process of generating, nurturing and closing leads &#8212; lead scoring &#8212; as you highlight above.</p>
<p>Four, both partnes need to work toward a repeatable lead management process built on these principles &#8212; rather than just a recurring gripe session.</p>
<p>To get going, you need to &#8216;break the ice&#8217; in this cold war, and we hope humor is one way to do that &#8212; hence the title and tenor of the paper.</p>
<p>Thanks, again, for the review and thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
