The B2B Lead

Lead Scoring



Why Are My Leads So Cold?

Drew Sollberger
  • LinkedIn
on March 30th, 2011
 

I’m not sure a single day has passed this quarter in which I haven’t fielded complaints from one of our sales reps about the warmth of their leads. Even though these leads may meet our scoring requirements based on activity, “they may as well be names from a phone book”, according to our reps. Initially I think to myself, “what the hell do you expect, 30 inbounds a day?”. While they definitely wouldn’t object, they’re much more reasonable then that.

So the question is: what DO they really expect? The good news is, this isn’t an uncommon problem. The Bridge Group recently published results of a survey of inside sales reps on this very issue. Check out one of the key metrics:

Pretty decisive, huh? While it’d be nice to be in that 7% that apparently deliver 75%+ in the sweet spot, the fact of the matter is, you work with what you’ve got. Since we’re still a smaller company, we don’t enjoy the kind of name recognition that a company like salesforce.com does. What we CAN control, though, is the framework we build for our lead scoring process and the agreement we make with sales to pass these leads over. Instead of the eternal back and forth of “marketing provides bad leads” and “sales doesn’t know how to follow up”, we can clearly define when and how leads will be passed, and also the level of qualification provided (”warmth”). Here’s a great chart from SiriusDecisions that we use as a general framework:

sd lead spectrum

Even if we’re only passing over Level 1 leads, sales reps are less likely to complain if that’s what they’re expecting. Ultimately, we can build expectations for delivery of leads at each level in the spectrum.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

 

Webinar – B2B Lead Scoring Best Practices That Drive Marketing Qualified Leads

  • LinkedIn
By admin
on March 13th, 2011
 

We don’t typically promote ReachForce events here on The B2B Lead but this one is best practice/tip oriented so we thought you might be a little more accepting of our shameless promotion.

ReachForce and partner Televerde present B2B Lead Scoring Best Practices that Drive Marketing Qualified Leads, a 30 minute must-attend webinar for B2B Marketers trying to up their game.

Lead Scoring, implemented the right way for your business can dramatically change your current sales and marketing relationships.  Enabling an effective lead scoring system will allow you to get to the right buyers, in the right companies, with the right message, and see increased marketing results and sales conversions. Everyone likes that.

We’ll focus our 30 minutes on HOW TO achieve enablement.  ReachForce and Televerde believe enablement is achieved when your contact database is optimized through gap analysis, enrichment and segmentation and when marketing automation and telepresence strategies are working in tandem.

Join us for a few great tips for building out a world-class lead scoring system for your business.

Details:

WHEN: March 16th, 2pm CDT

WHAT: 30 minute webinar – we know you’re busy, so we’re keeping it short and to the point!

WHO:
Donna J. Kent, Senior Vice President of Global Sales, Marketing and Services for Televerde
Cody Young, Vice President of Channel Development and Product Strategy, ReachForce

WHY:  Unless you’re too busy having a love fest with your sales team, you can benefit from better lead scoring.

OTHER:  Can’t make it on Wednesday?  Sign up anyway and we’ll be sure to send you the onDemand version.

Sign up now and we look forward to chatting with you on the 16th.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Sunday, March 13th, 2011

 

B2B Lead Scoring – Cut the Chase, Just Ask! B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #306

Filed under Lead Scoring
  • LinkedIn
on January 6th, 2011
 

A lead score – an ever-evolving number assigned to a lead that changes with both activity and inactivity.  A scoring system based on what the vendor deems important and what that vendor marks as key buying indicators.  But, all buyers don’t act the same and care about the same things?

Should a contact really be considered a hot lead if they open a few key emails and visit your website a time or two? What about if they download some of your gated content?  Does this mean they want to buy from you?  Maybe.

With this information all you can do is speculate.

At ReachForce, we are doing a different kind of lead scoring. Instead of analyzing prospect behaviors, we are going directly to them and asking them to participate in a survey. By gathering qualifying information directly from the prospect, we are able to better target messaging, content and call-to-actions at these new prospects.

By enabling them to get to the right buyers, in the right companies, with the right message, they are seeing increased marketing results and sales conversions.

Here are few tips building out this kind of lead scoring survey.  Lead Scoring surveys can quickly:

  1. Qualify a company as a user of a certain technology or application – This type of question is to confirm if a prospect organization uses something that either compliments or competes with our offering.
  2. Find out respondent status: decision maker, a part of a decision making team or a secondary influencer – This type of question is useful when setting the stage for a sales call or marketing campaign so messaging can be made as relevant and personalized as possible.
  3. Find out how well the top 23 product or service “key values” are recognized by each respondent – A “key value” is something that makes an offering better, unique or uncommonly relevant to the prospect. This type of question is used to find out if they will “get” your value proposition, or if education or special messaging is required.
  4. Measure how important key values are to each respondent – This follow up to Q3 is used to find out how important the respondent thinks the sponsor’s key values are. Combined scores to this set of questions are used to determine degree of interest and help make sales and marketing messaging relevant and personal when following up on the lead.
  5. Determine budget – This type of question is used to pinpoint how much the respondents’ organization spends (and by implication would expect to spend next time) on offerings similar to ours. Paying close attention to scores that are too low help sales and marketing teams prioritize.
  6. Confirm plan – This question helps find out when or how often the respondent is in the market for what we are selling. Questions like this can also be centered on finding trigger events (audits, budget planning, corporate initiatives) that create sales opportunity.
  7. Establish time line or “window of sales opportunity” – By combining the responses to “Confirm plan” and this type of question, the result is normally a reliable indication of when the respondent’s organization will begin a buying cycle.

The lead score we ended up with for each prospect helped to determine if the prospect can be immediately handed off to sales or put into a marketing campaign for further nurturing.  (In fact, we ask them if they want to be contacted by someone)

Sometimes, just coming right out and asking for the information you need works best.

What do you think?  Have you tried something this direct before?

REMINDER – if a lead responds in a way that you know they are not a fit for your solution, don’t continue to reach out, they consider you spam and bothersome.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Thursday, January 6th, 2011

 

Top Challenges for B2B Marketers

Drew Sollberger
  • LinkedIn
on October 25th, 2010
 

As evidenced by a recent MarketingSherpa survey, the top challenges for B2B marketers continue to be generating high quality leads and generating enough of them. Not surprisingly, these are becoming more pertinent year over year.

What’s interesting is that many marketers are building more sophisticated lead scoring and lead nurturing methodologies to combat the problem. How come nobody’s talking about how to get better data in the first place, or how to keep your existing data clean and sales ready? The engine may be the most obvious to fix, but it doesn’t do much good without the proper fuel.

Check out the survey results from MarketingSherpa here: Top 10 Challenges for B2B Marketers

chartofweek-10-12-10

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Monday, October 25th, 2010

 

Increase Lead-to-Sales Ratios with Effective Lead Qualification and Scoring

Lauren Kincke
on September 10th, 2009

Thanks to Kevin Joyce at Market2Lead for his post earlier this week.  In addition to learning about Market2Lead, we want to share with our readers one of their whitepapers, Increase Lead-to-Sales Ratios with Effective Lead Qualification and Scoring.  In it Market2Lead’s CEO Geoff Rego walks through some key pieces to developing a robust Lead Scoring process.  Some of the highlights:

  1. Define ‘Qualified’ – this is something we’ve spoken about before on the B2B Lead (check out Amy’s post, What is a Lead? What is a Prospect?), it’s key to make sure your entire team is on the same page when it comes to what a qualified lead is, what a prospect is, etc.
  2. Qualify your leads in stages – don’t assume that you can qualify all of your leads at once or one time, you should continuously be in the process of qualifying what is in your database as well as what is coming into your database.  By the same token, make sure you’re also disqualifying things continuously too!  (We’ve chatted about ways to disqualify)
  3. Get help!  If you can’t do this alone (which is pretty likely), use technology.  There are numerous tools out there, both within Marketing Automation Systems and things you can build yourself within Sales Force Automation tools that can score your leads for you.  It’s reasonable to assume you can qualify a few hundred (or even a few thousand) leads with good eyes and some manpower, it’s a bit overwhelming to assume you can qualify tens of thousands (or more) leads by yourself.  Don’t let this task overwhelm you, look for software that can help.
  4. Do this now!  Don’t wait to implement lead scoring and qualification practices, it may not be perfect the first time around but getting the ball rolling is an important step.  The faster you start, the more ‘gems’ you might find in your own data.

Need more tips on Lead Scoring? Check out the Market2Lead white paper!

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Thursday, September 10th, 2009

 

Lead Scoring…Baby Steps – B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #256

It’s the topic of discussion for so many webinars, whitepapers and blog posts (even here), but do you actually do lead scoring?  Until very recently, we hadn’t figured out a way to incorporate all of the various technology tools (Eloqua for Marketing Automation, HubSpot for its unique Internet Marketing tracking/features and Salesforce.com for Sales Automation) we use into one comprehensive score.  So the question is, how do you close the loop with that many systems interacting?

To regress a little bit, we have always had lead scoring on the list of to-do’s.  It’s been on that list for easily the last three or four quarters, but each time it comes down to the wire either there’s not enough time or there is just so much for us to wrap together that it’s a little overwhelming.  Honestly, it wasn’t a high priority this quarter, but our Sales team was looking for a way to prioritize the accounts they were working so we initially (accidentally) built an explicit lead scoring system.   We set point values for things like:

  • Having key players in the decision making unit in our CRM and/or knowing that they exist
  • Knowing if the prospect markets to more than one vertical (and what space they play in)
  • What Marketing Automation system the prospect uses
  • What CRM the prospect uses
  • ASP (Average Sales Price)

Eventually this all gets tabulated into a score (and the information collected in creating the score), that score determines a few things.  First, what kind of marketing messages the contacts within the account get and secondly, whether or not the rep even wants them followed up with.  That second item is determined by a score in the negative range…we’ve got some accounts that our reps don’t want to work with for specific reasons and those automatically get a -100 added to their score so we can better differentiate them from the rest of the crowd.

Originally this was good for us, we felt that it was a start towards the lead scoring we wanted to have and that it would give our sales team the info they needed to better prioritize their follow up.  Well it left something out…in focusing only on the accounts they were selling in to, we left out the leads they still need to follow up with in order to efficiently prospect for new business. So we went back to the drawing board.

Our next pass ended up being a more implicitly focused lead score.  With the help of one of our more development minded co-workers, we were able to employ an Apex Trigger in salesforce.com that checks for activity on the lead records and gives a score according to the frequency and creator of the activity.  To speak slightly more English (and less tech), if a lead has 3-5 activities from either HubSpot or Eloqua, meaning a form download, website activity or email open, created within a 3 month timeframe then they are ‘cold’ – if they have 3-5 activities within a 1 month timeframe then they are ‘warm’ and if they have 3-5 activities within a week they are ‘hot.’  Our basic idea being that within salesforce.com we set up views of cold-warm-hot leads and our reps can just follow up with those, instead of worrying about who is coming out of what nurture cycle behind the scenes.   So the sales team essentially gets a window on who is actually raising their hand and only those who do so often enough to be considered interest in us and our products.

By no means have we completed this process but we’re definitely off to a start. Closing the loop between our various tools one score at a time…do you score your leads, if so, how?

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Friday, August 28th, 2009

 

Explicit vs Implicit Lead Scoring – B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #248

Lead Scoring is hot right now and for good reason. As marketers, we finally have the technology tools available to enable us to score and qualify leads before passing them off to sales.  What a lot of people are talking about is activity based or implicit lead scoring. This means scoring a lead based on the actions they are taking like downloading an eBook or attending a demo.  There is another side to lead scoring, explicit or attribute based lead scoring.  This is a way of scoring a lead based on things like title, geography or industry.

Here are some actions to consider for implicit lead scoring:

  • content download
  • email open/click-through
  • website visit
    • number of pages visited
    • time on site
    • time spent on product pages
    • time spent on careers page
  • event attendance
  • viewed webinar
  • viewed product demo

When you are scoring a lead based on their actions, remember that some actions will actually lower a lead’s score.  You might consider taking points off for those leads that are visiting your careers page.  Also remember to track inactivity.  A lead that was hot six months ago but has had no activity in the past six months should probably lose points and be downgraded from hot lead status until they re-engage.

Here are some attributes to consider for explicit lead scoring:

  • title
  • department
  • industry
  • budget
  • propensity to purchase
  • role in the decision making unit

If you don’t have all of this information about your leads you can gather it through your web lead forms or through surveys.  We have found internally that our sales team prefers to know more about a lead’s explicit attributes rather that their actions.

The best lead scoring programs will have both explicit and implicit components.  Talk to your sales team to find out what they value most.  They will also have insight into what types of leads convert.  Look back to see where your current customers came from.  Did they download a certain whitepaper?  Did they click through a specific email?  Did they attend a webinar?  Determine your ideal buyer profile.  Are they VP level?  What industry are they in?

Once you have your lead scoring program in place, don’t forget to educate your sales team on what that means.  Make sure they know how the lead attained the score.  Also be sure to allow sales to turn those leads back to you if inactivity warrants further nurturing.  No matter how well you research ahead of time to score the leads the most approriately this is still a learning process. Ask for feedback from your sales team to make sure you really are passing over hot leads and adjust your programs as necessary.  Happy scoring!

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Monday, June 15th, 2009

 

The Springboard Effect of Marketing – B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #219

B2B Marketers have been going through big changes the last couple of years.  With marketing automation tools/platforms coming on strong, so are the questions of ROI and the effect marketing really has on the top line.

Our jobs have changed, we are no longer responsible for just general awareness and filling the top of the sales funnel.  Instead, we are tasked with moving leads from cold to close and building a closed loop feedback system with Sales along the way.

Eloqua, one of our partners, has a new whitepaper, The Springboard Effect, that does a great job of describing how our roles have changed and what is now expected of a best-in-class B2B Marketer.

Here’s a few interesting bites from The Springboard Effect:

  • Jaap Favier, Vice President and Research Director for Forrester Research, emphasized that intelligence will be a key differentiator in the way companies survive a downturn.  “The name of the new marketing game: targeting.”

We love hearing this, it’s what we’re all about here at ReachForce.

  • Aberdeen Group says that “companies with best-in-class lead prioritization and scoring systems have a 192% higher average lead qualification rate than those that do not.”
  • According to SiriusDecisions, 79% of leads generated by marketing are not followed up on by sales teams.  Of the remaining, 70% of leads are disqualified by sales because of lack of budget, timing, or other reasons.

Ok – here’s the MOST INTERESTING part – SiriusDecisions goes on to say that 70% of those disqualified leads go on to purchase the product or service from another vendor.

WOW – look at all of the opportunity lost!

Interesting stuff here, be sure to check out the rest for yourself.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

 

Customer Experience Index Scoring – Part 7 – B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #192

This is the 7th in a series discussing Customer Experience Indexing (CEITM) as a way to measure, plan and act on customer feedback.  (#1) (#2) (#3) (#4) (#5) (#6)

Here is the outline we’ve been following:

  1. CEI Initiative Planning
  2. Optimizing the flow of both loyalty and satisfaction feedback
  3. Analysis of feedback and calculation of actionable CEI metrics
  4. Using the data for short, mid and long term account plans for retention and growth
  5. Using the data to plan and deliver action plans aimed at reshaping customer attitudes and opinions
  6. (We are here) Using the data to locate new prospects using rule based company profiling and role-based targeting

So far we’ve gathered then used CEI response data for scoring to examine three existing customer scenarios as examples:

  • An expanded Net Promoter-type way to calculate and measure satisfaction + prompted + unprompted customer advocacy
  • Applying CEI-metrics for better account-by-account management planning
  • Building CEI-lenses for better strategies and tactics for up-selling, cross-selling and renewals.

Next on the list is to take a look at using CEI response data to help locate, target and engage with net-New prospects.

Reference Account Management

The most obvious and useful way CEI scoring benefits the new sales process is the buttoned down way it sorts advocacy dynamics and pinpoints which current customers would make the best references based on data analysis, not on someone’s opinion. There is nothing more powerful from a news sales perspective than having a well stocked supply of sales ready references. It happens every day across the world, thousands of times a day ― a sales person bursts into the marketing or account manager’s office needing three references to connect with their prospect. Not only is the list of needed attributes arms length, but it all needs to happen before tomorrow afternoon. Sound familiar? Yes it does.

This scenario takes us back to the first exercise we did for determining what a customer’s advocacy rating is. Remember it’s a matter of reading how a customer feels about their entire experience with your company using a scoring schema that takes metrics from both qualitative (loyalty) and quantitative (satisfaction) feedback into account. So if asked to produce recommendations about what customers should be the best sales-ready references we’d produce response scores rendered from a two-step lens build that would look something like this:

Step 1 Top 10 Sales Ready Reference Accounts

Once each row on the customer list has an assigned CEI Advocacy Score, simply sort this column in descending order and in combination with the column for customer response time to your survey plus overall satisfaction scores, plus Key Weight. This  (if you remember back to the 1st and 2nd posts in this series) is because the survey invitations were sent as an integrated campaign, i.e. first an email, then another, then a phone call reminder from the account manager, then another from an executive, then perhaps another email, etc., thus determining how quick to respond each survey taker was. It stands to reason that someone who responded quickly in combination with high scores from Advocacy, Satisfaction and Key Weight are going to be a good sales ready reference account.

Step 2 Top 10 Sales Ready Reference Accounts

So the above mentioned sort produces a top 10 list based on:

Next week we’ll cover ways to build rules-based profiles of your most successful customers and your relationships with them and then use the data to score how well new company targets match the rules.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

 

The 6 Principles of Deliberate Marketing: Nurture vs. Capture – B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #191

This is the fifth post in a series on Deliberate Marketing. Be sure to check out the first 4 posts: Intention vs. Attention, Qualified Buyers vs. Leads, Role vs. Title and Predictable vs. Spray and Pray.

Deliberate Marketing doesn’t involve capturing any and all leads, then tossing them over the fence to sales. Deliberate Marketing is about engaging with prospects, understanding their needs and scoring them based on their interests and behavior to determine their stage in the buying cycle. It’s about nurturing them with targeted communications and offers until they are ready to engage with sales.

A prospect that downloads a whitepaper probably needs to be further nurtured by marketing before being passed on to sales, whereas a prospect that requests a 30-day trial can be immediately handed off to sales.  This is different for each business; be sure to have an agreement with sales on when leads should be handed over.

With a Deliberate Marketing approach, B2B Marketers can ensure their leads receive the proper follow-up and that buyers are not discarded simply because they are not ready to make a purchase immediately.  Feedback loops between marketing and sales are necessary so that any leads that are passed to sales too early can be sent back to marketing for continued nurturing.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


Monday, January 19th, 2009

 
- - -     |     Home     |     About ReachForce     |     Contact     |     Archives     |     - - -